This was the third lawsuit brought against UMS since 2017 by the same competitor, all of which were dismissed. UMS maintains that these were frivolous lawsuits designed to harm its reputation and drain resources—a practice known as predatory litigation.
Despite the legal challenges, UMS continues to operate, offering metaphysical and spiritual education. However, the case has sparked discussions about online defamation, fake news, and aggressive business competition in alternative education.
What Was the Lawsuit About?
The lawsuit centered around Google ads. The competitor claimed that UMS ran ads using their name to divert traffic. UMS countered that it had proof from Google AdWords showing it never ran such ads. The case was dismissed when the competitor dropped their claims, and UMS withdrew its countersuit.
Key Points of the Lawsuit:
-
No evidence of wrongdoing by UMS – The court found no merit in the competitor’s claims.
-
Predatory litigation – UMS argues the lawsuits were meant to harass them rather than seek justice.
-
No impact on accreditation or operations – The case did not involve student complaints or academic validity.
The Problem of Fake Articles and Online Attacks
Since the lawsuit began, UMS has faced a massive online smear campaign, including:
-
Over 600 fake articles are spreading false claims about the lawsuit.
-
Manipulated Google search results with derogatory terms like “University of Metaphysical Sciences lawsuit” and “UMS Sedona Arizona” (even though UMS is based in California).
-
AI-generated misinformation – A specific AI was reportedly fed false data, leading to incorrect summaries about the case.
UMS is now pursuing legal action to remove defamatory content and hold those responsible accountable.
What Is Predatory Litigation?
Predatory litigation is when a business repeatedly sues a competitor with weak or false claims to drain their finances and damage their reputation. UMS claims this is what happened here.
How It Works:
-
File multiple lawsuits – Even if they lack evidence, forcing the other side to spend on legal fees.
-
Demand settlements – Hoping the target pays to avoid further costs.
-
Use lawsuits to gather private data, Such as financial records and emails.
UMS says its competitor spent over $1.5 million on these lawsuits but failed to win any of them.
What’s Next for UMS?
With the lawsuit dismissed, UMS is focusing on:
-
Cleaning up its online reputation – Removing fake articles and correcting false search results.
-
Strengthening legal protections – To prevent future predatory lawsuits.
-
Continuing its educational mission – Offering courses in metaphysics, spirituality, and energy healing.
The school remains confident in its future, stating that no legal challenge has disrupted its operations or accreditation.
Lessons from This Case
-
Not Everything Online Is True – Fake articles and manipulated search results can distort reality.
-
Predatory Lawsuits Are a Real Threat – Businesses must be prepared for legal harassment from competitors.
-
Evidence Matters – UMS won because it had documented proof disproving the claims against it.
Final Thoughts
The University of Metaphysical Sciences lawsuit was less about legal wrongdoing and more about a competitor’s aggressive tactics. The dismissal confirms UMS’s stance that the case had no merit.
Moving forward, UMS aims to rebuild trust and continue providing metaphysical education. For students and supporters, the key takeaway is to seek facts from official sources rather than relying on sensationalized online claims.
If you’re interested in UMS’s programs, the school remains operational, and its degrees—while not regionally accredited—are recognized in spiritual and holistic fields. The legal battle may be over, but the conversation about fair competition and online integrity continues.
Would you like more details on UMS’s programs or how to spot fake news? Let us know in the comments!
