Did you know that a single government entity, operating in near-total secrecy, has fired thousands of federal workers, canceled billions in contracts, and accessed sensitive personal data—all while claiming it doesn’t have to follow transparency laws?
This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s the reality of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a controversial initiative led by Elon Musk under the Trump administration. Now, watchdog groups are fighting in court to force DOGE to comply with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)—and the legal battle could redefine government transparency in the U.S.
What Is DOGE—And Why Is It So Controversial?
DOGE was created to “streamline” the federal government, but its methods have been extreme: mass firings, abrupt contract cancellations, and sweeping takeovers of agency functions. It has dismantled entire departments, like the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and gained access to sensitive systems containing Social Security records, labor data, and more.
Yet, DOGE insists it’s just an “advisory body” to the president—meaning it claims it doesn’t have to respond to FOIA requests, the law that lets the public access government records.
That argument didn’t hold up in court.
The Court Ruling That Could Force DOGE to Open Up
In March 2025, a federal judge delivered a bombshell decision: DOGE is likely subject to FOIA because it exercises “substantial independent authority” over federal operations. The judge pointed to DOGE’s power to:
-
Fire federal employees
-
Cancel government contracts
-
Override agency decisions
-
Access confidential databases without clear oversight
This wasn’t just advisory work—it was direct control. The judge ordered DOGE to start processing FOIA requests immediately, calling the secrecy “irreparably harmful” to the public.
But DOGE didn’t comply. Instead, it stalled, appealed, and even tried to delete records.
The Government’s Playbook: Delay, Deny, and Defy
DOGE’s legal strategy has been simple: drag out the process until transparency no longer matters.
-
Ignoring Deadlines: Despite court orders, DOGE took weeks just to estimate how many documents it would need to release (58,000—meaning it could take years to disclose them all).
-
Switching Legal Arguments: First, DOGE claimed it wasn’t an agency. Then, when that failed, it argued that turning over records would “distract from its mission.”
-
Appealing to the Supreme Court: The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to block the lower court’s ruling, arguing that forcing transparency would violate “presidential confidentiality.”
Meanwhile, whistleblowers revealed that DOGE employees may have accessed and removed sensitive labor data from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) while trying to hide their digital tracks. If true, this raises alarming questions: What else is DOGE doing behind closed doors?
Why This Fight Matters Beyond DOGE
This isn’t just about one rogue government unit. The DOGE case could set a dangerous precedent:
-
Shadow Governments Could Become Normal – If presidents can create unchecked entities like DOGE, future administrations could use the same loophole to operate without oversight.
-
FOIA Could Be Gutted – If courts accept DOGE’s argument that it’s exempt from FOIA simply because the White House says so, other agencies might follow suit.
-
Public Trust Will Erode Further – When the government operates in secrecy, conspiracy theories thrive. Transparency isn’t just a legal issue—it’s essential for democracy.
What Happens Next?
The Supreme Court could soon decide whether DOGE must follow FOIA. But even if the court rules against transparency, the fight won’t end. Watchdog groups are already using creative legal tactics, like demanding records before key budget deadlines or suing to stop document destruction.
One thing is clear: DOGE’s secrecy has exposed a glaring flaw in U.S. transparency laws. Whether the courts fix it—or let it get worse—will shape how much the public ever learns about the government’s inner workings.
Final Thought: Transparency Isn’t Optional
Governments operate with public money and public trust. When they hide their actions, they undermine both. The DOGE lawsuits aren’t just bureaucratic squabbles—they’re a test of whether the U.S. government still answers to the people.
And right now, that answer is hanging in the balance.
